DRAFT, 10/03/01
W.
Ross Adey, M.D.
Physiology
Dept
Loma
Linda University School of Medicine
White Paper:
SPECIAL FOCUS AREA: BRAIN MACHINE INTERFACES
(Defense
Sciences Office, Solicitation BAA 01-42, Addendum 1, 9/17/2001)
1.
Statement of Target Goals:
The broad goal of this DARPA plan is to create new
technologies that would augment human performance through noninvasive access to
brain signal patterns in real time, for the purpose of using these integrated
brain signals in sophisticated control of certain machine operations:
1)
Extraction
of neural codes related to patterns of sensory and motor activity in a spectrum
of motor activities ranging from simple to complex; and to develop similar
capabilities with respect to brain signaling in the special senses,
specifically in the auditory and visual modalities.
2)
Direct
feedback to the brain from peripheral devices or systems of derived or
transformed signal patterns that would allow closed-loop control of robotic or
other peripheral systems.
3)
Develop
and apply new pattern recognition techniques to physiological patterns of brain
activity derived noninvasively, applying outputs of these analyses to close
loop control of peripheral devices. Identification of these patterns would
involve tests of multimodal data acquisition, including transduction by
magnetic and light sensors.
4)
By
the use of new materials and new designs for devices, to meet needs in neural
control of systems having defined physical elastic and compliance
characteristics; and to develop working prototypes of these devices and
systems.
5)
Demonstration
of adaptive abilities in the patterns of neural signals selected for device
control, with progressive refinement of neural signal pattern sensitivity and
selectivity, as a biological self-organizing property.
6)
Robotic
or similar implementation of an actual working system of controllers that
incorporate neural sensory and motor control, based on force dynamic and
sensory feedback.
This
White Paper focuses primarily, but not exclusively, on TOPICS 1-3.
2.
Extraction of neural codes related to patterns of sensory and motor
activity
A non-invasive approach to detection of
relevant neural signal patterns is offered as a preemptive guideline for this
program. Thus, this will become the first and highest
-1-
priority
in development of all signal conditioning and data analysis systems. It also
determines the nature and scope of key higher order factors to be evaluated in
the planned studies.
2.a. System requirements for development of
neural codes:
2.a.1. It will be assumed that idiosyncratic signatures unique to an
individual
subject will be unacceptable
for machine control. Acceptable neural codes
should contain robust signatures. Optimally, this would
permit their
adaptive utilization
by a population of suitably trained individuals.
2.a.2 Acceptable neural codes should be exportable and capable of operation
world wide, either as local controllers, or as telecontrollers physically
removed from the operational
environment.
2.a.3 Genesis of an approved neural code by a trained subject, and
application of
its transforms to machine
control, should be via devices functioning as far
as possible on a non-interference basis with essential
physical mobility of
the subject. Thus, beyond
proof-of-concept technology in a laboratory
environment, major attention
must be devoted to design, development and
testing of operational
hardware.
3.
Evidence for existence of control signatures in electroencephalographic
(EEG)
records of human task performance under controlled conditions
The
human EEG is a wave-like process generated in the cerebral cortex under all
conditions of wakefulness and sleep. The planned studies require a clear
understanding of structural organization mediating its genesis. It is a
phenomenon unique to cortical structures and to a few non-cortical central
nervous centers with a similar anatomical infrastructure.
3.a.1 Cortical neurons have large, spreading dendritic branches, or
arborizations, which are
entwined with similar arborizations of adjacent
neurons. They make physical and functional contact with one
another.
3.a.2 Electrodes placed inside single cortical neurons record large
(~20-30
millivolts) slow electrical waves with most energy in the spectrum
1-30 Hz. These waves are generated in the dendritic trees (Elul, 1972),
and have led to the eponym,
"the independent dendrite" (Szuromi, 2001).
3.a.3 A small portion of this intracellular signal (< 1.0%)
appears in brain fluid
that surrounds neurons. It is recorded as the summed activity of
dendrites
of many neurons on the
cortical surface, or on the scalp, with little further
attenuation (10-200
microvolts).
3.a.4 It is important to note that the EEG is not formed as the
envelope of the
firing of numerous nerve impulses. It is an intimate signaling system by
which a population of nerve cell cells in a single region or domain
"whisper together"
in a faint and private language (Adey, 1993).
3.a.5 Formerly
dismissed as "the noise of the brain's motor" by the Nobel
-2-
Laureate Sir John Carew
Eccles, the EEG is now recognized as intimately
correlated with information
transaction and recall. Genesis of nerve
impulses may be considered a high order transform of this
transactional
wave activity (Wei et al.,
2001).
3.a.6
Moreover, 60% of cortical neurons are Golgi Type II cells. Lacking an
axon for nerve impulse
transmission, they can communicate with adjacent
neurons solely through
dendro-dendritic contacts.
3.a.7
There is growing evidence that such an internal communication system is
a determinant of a response threshold for a group or domain
of elements
(Bialek, 1983, 1984) in quorum decision making, and is not the
property
of any single element within
that domain (Jessup et al., 2000).
3.b. As discussed below, by reason of its genesis in multidimensional
patterns
that appear in scalp records as an almost infinite
variety of spatiotemporal and phase-related patterns, the EEG would appear to offer a much richer repertoire of potential
control signals than available from multineuronal firing records, even if
these were available for the current purpose.
3.b.1 Early animal studies
of correlates between intraneuronal waves and the
EEG in the surrounding brain
tissue confirmed a close similarity in
frequency spectra, but
virtually no coherence between the two
waveforms 3.b.2 Also, multipolar
EEG records using orthogonal electrodes with tips
separated only by cellular
dimensions (~10 microns) were incoherent
in
their frequency spectra (Elul, 1972).
These findings
support the conclusion that in normal brain tissue, individual
neuronal wave
generators are in a chaotic or "noisy" state, as indicated by
strong trends towards Gaussian EEG amplitude
distributions in man in
"resting"
behavioral states.
3.b.3 Further studies in man have reported 1) sensitive trends away
from
Gaussian amplitude
distributions during mental task performance; and 2) a
virtual absence of Gaussian
distributions in records from epileptic brain
tissue. If Gaussian EEG
amplitude distributions provide indices of
functional levels of
interconnection within and between domains of brain
tissue, they would support a model of the brain as a "noisy
processor",
with this pseudorandom
organization as a sensitive indicator of
information processing
(Adey, 1972).
4.0
Experimental evidence for individual and group EEG signatures
correlated with task
performances.
Development
of new knowledge in this field of EEG control has stagnated following an era of
substantive early achievements three decades ago. Most of this early work was
funded by DOD agencies - AFOSR, ONR, ARPA - and by NASA. In part, this approach
-3-
fell
into disfavor through problems of neuroelectric data acquisition in performing
subjects, in computational limitations in nonlinear analysis of chaotic
systems, and limited robustness of pattern recognition methods.
Related
developments in robotics and in medical prosthetics have come to rely heavily
on neuromuscular control signals. These have a high level of reliability and
repeatability. Thus, the potential for successful brain-machine interfaces has
remained largely unexplored in the interim, and modern data analysis and
pattern recognition methods have not been applied to these problems.
4.a.
Shared EEG signatures in a population of astronaut candidates as
concomitants of
auditory and visual tasks of increasing complexity
Complexities
of multichannel EEG records and differences between subjects have discouraged
fine interpretations based on visual inspection of computer printouts. With
support from NASA, a "normative library" was therefore developed by
computer analysis and pattern recognition, using EEG data from 50 astronaut candidates
(Walter et al., 1967). Scalp EEG electrodes were placed according to a modified
International 10-20 Pattern to provide 18 data channels.
Accurately
timed physiological stimuli and perceptual and learning tasks were presented,
thus establishing group means for EEG records from each test situation. In each
case, despite wide individual differences between subjects, the group mean
and/or pattern of variance in spectral densities for each test condition
presented a characteristic pattern. These patterns were consistent with
neurophysiological organization in corticosubcortical interrelations of
cerebral systems.
There
have been no published replications of this or similar studies, despite its
clear potential for monitoring and controlling man-machine interactions in
complex environments.
4.b. EEG motor signal tracking with an
adaptive phase-locked loop as an approach to
prosthetic control
A
study at UCLA Brain Research Institute, supported in part by AFOSR, established
the feasibility of prosthetic control by the use of EEG signatures (Nirenberg
et al., 1971).
The
study involved two subjects, one normal and the other a hand amputee. As a
prototype for control by an adaptive phase-locked loop (PLL), each subject
performed a prototype task of opening and closing the hand. The normal subject
accomplished this, while the amputee attempted to use the missing hand as
though it were present. Simultaneously, the scalp EEG was recorded from a site
presumed to overly the left motor cortex. Parameters of the PLL were adaptively
chosen to implement on-line monitoring of the EEG. Threshold logic applied to
the PLL output V yielded a promising method to detect motor action from the
EEG record in the normal subject and the amputee. The PLL parameters, optimized
by visual inspection of V, were identical in both cases,
except for the center frequencies of the voltage-controlled oscillator. The
final
-4-
thresholds
differed only slightly.
The
investigators remarked that at that time, "The control of externally
powered prosthetic devices by sensing of brain waves has been completely
ignored." The position remains unchanged three decades later.
**********************************************************************
[5. Method of procedure, expected outcomes,
utility of the method…….etc., ….etc]
**********************************************************************
References
Adey
WR. Organization of brain tissue: is the brain a noisy processor? Internat J.
Neurosci. 3:271-284, 1972.
Adey
WR. Electromagnetics in biology and medicine. International Union of Radio
Sciences. In: H Matsumoto, ed. Modern Radio Science. Oxford University Press.
pp.231-249, 1993.
Bialek
W. Macroquantum effects in biology: the evidence. Ph.D. thesis, Department of
Chemistry, University of California, Berkeley.
250pp. 1983.
Bialek
W, Wit HP. Quantum limits to oscillator stability: theory and experiments on
acoustic emissions from the human ear. Phys. Lett. 104A:173-178, 1984.
Elul
R. The genesis of the EEG. Internat.
Rev.Neurobiol. 15: 228-251, 1972.
Jessup
JM, Fra nz M, Sonmez-Alpan E, Locker J,
Skena K, Waller H, Battle P, Nachman
A, Weber ME, Thomas DA, Curbeam RL, Baker TL,
Goodwin TJ. Microgravity
culture reduces apoptosis and increases the
differentiation of a human colorectal
carcinoma cell line. In Vitro Cell Dev. Biol. - Animal 36:367-373, 2000.
Nirenberg
LM, Hanley J, Stear EB. A new approach to prosthetic control: EEG motor
signal tracking with an adaptively designed
phase-locked loop. IEEE Trans.
Biomed Eng. BME-18:389-398, 1971.
Szuromi
P. The independent dendrite. Science
293:2166, 2001.
Walter
DO, Kado RT, Rhodes JM, Adey WR. Electroencephalographic baselines in
astronaut candidates estimated by computations and
pattern recognition
techniques. Aerospace
Med. 38:371-379, 1967.
Wei
DS, Mei YA, Bagal A, Kao JPY, Thompson SM, Tang CM. Compartmentalized and
binary behavior of terminal dendrites in hippocampal
pyramidal neurons. Science
293:2272-2275, 2001.